In episode 39 of the 20 minutes VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Simon Manashi, Investment Director at MMC Ventures. Manashi shares his journey from a technology-enthusiastic kid to a venture capitalist, emphasizing the importance of networking and warm referrals in gaining VC attention. He advises founders to focus on clear, concise pitches and be prepared for questions rather than overloading with documentation. Manashi highlights MMC Ventures' interest in Series A funding for companies with proven customer value and potential for growth. He discusses the evolving startup funding landscape, the role of government in fostering a conducive environment for tech startups, and the potential for technology to disrupt industries like healthcare, fintech, and logistics. The conversation also touches on the challenges of market creation versus entering established markets and concludes with Manashi's views on the importance of founders being open to feedback and the potential for private capital to alter traditional IPO pathways.
"Simon is an investment director at MMC Ventures, where he is responsible for leading new and followon investments, as well as supporting existing MMC portfolio companies."
This quote introduces Simon Menashy's role and responsibilities at MMC Ventures, highlighting his involvement in investment decisions and company support.
"I was a strategy consultant for my sins, mainly doing technology, media, telecoms kind of work."
This quote explains Simon's experience at Deloitte, where he focused on strategy consulting within specific industries, providing a foundation for his understanding of business.
"Most of our investments are people that we've known for a few years by the time we invest, or they're people that have come through really a person that we trust."
This quote emphasizes the importance of building relationships and trust in the venture capital industry, noting that many investments come from established connections.
"Honestly, I think a lot of founders make the mistake of thinking that they need to come up with a really big formal pitch."
This quote advises founders against creating overly formal pitches, suggesting that substance and preparedness for dialogue are more important than formality.## Pitch Meeting Dynamics
"I think really first pitch meetings are not formal pitches that last an hour. They quickly devolve into question and answers and I think the best founders go with that and love the challenge and rise to it and you come out of the meeting feeling you've had a great conversation."
The quote highlights the nature of initial pitch meetings, emphasizing the importance of adaptability and conversation over strictly formal presentations.
"They're testing your thinking. They're testing really, is the business model going to work? Really, is the market as big as we all think it is? And is that really addressable?"
This quote explains that VCs are interested in a founder's thought process and the potential of the business model and market, rather than just the information on the slides.
"I would much rather that a founder comes in with 1520 minutes presentation prepared, which probably takes half an hour because I'll ask some questions and we'll have a nice chat around a few things and then we have lots of time to delve into different areas or talk about a particular challenge that I might have in the rest of the hour."
The quote suggests a preference for shorter presentations to allow for a more interactive meeting, with the potential to extend beyond the scheduled time if the discussion warrants it.
"So at MMC we're typically investing in the series A round. So for us that means a company that's got some initial traction, it's got customers, customers that are willing to pay and that are demonstrably getting some kind of value or ROI out of the product."
This quote outlines the investment criteria for MMC, focusing on companies at the Series A stage with proven traction and customer value.
"I think when a lot of people say disruption, what they really mean is a new technology or a new way of doing things, or a new approach that makes something ten times better or ten times faster or ten times cheaper, and that's normally ten times better, faster or cheaper for some sort of customer."
The quote defines disruption as technological or methodological advancements that drastically improve products or services for customers.
"I don't think it's replacing black cabs. There may be a little bit of replacement in the short term, but I think it's enabling totally new journeys."
This quote clarifies that Uber's role is not just to replace existing services but to create new opportunities and choices in transportation.
"I think we're moving away from a world where big means efficient, so big companies do lots of things in an okay way because I think now technology is enabling people to do very niche things in just as good way as a big company can do that."
The quote predicts a shift from the dominance of large companies to the rise of smaller entities using technology to compete effectively, signaling disruption in various industries.## Evolution of Industry Disruption by Startups
a lot of physical things involved. So it hasn't just been a software problem until now, those sorts of industries where we've had less headway to date, but now there's a new generation of startups that are starting to really change the way that some of those big, slower and quite comfortable industries work.
The quote emphasizes the shift in innovation within industries that were traditionally focused on physical goods and services. Startups are now beginning to significantly alter these sectors.
I think London's always been a financial services hub, or at least for the last few decades. So it's more a matter of technology changing every industry and the financial services industry being in London.
This quote explains why London is naturally positioned as a fintech hub, attributing it to the city's longstanding financial services industry and the infusion of technology within all sectors.
I'm not sure it's entirely within the government's gift, but there's a lot that the government has done and can do and really successive governments of all colours.
Simon Menashy acknowledges that while government actions are important, the overall tech community's success is a collaborative effort. Government policies can significantly influence the startup ecosystem's health.
I think at the IPO end, when you're talking about very large startups or startups that aren't really startups anymore, the market's changed quite a lot and you're seeing a lot more private capital.
Simon Menashy describes the trend of more private capital entering the market as startups grow larger, which affects the traditional path to an IPO.
I think that's how we're seeing it practically, yes. So a lot of the Series A and Series B money, ultimately the lps in those funds are still institutions, pension funds, insurance companies, and traditional lps, and they're probably not making any more of an asset allocation to VC than they ever were.
Simon Menashy confirms the 'barbell' analogy, highlighting the concentration of capital at the extremes and a thinner middle in the funding spectrum due to unchanged investment strategies from institutional investors.
So companies raising anything from sort of one to 5 million, where they're probably doing something along the lines of half a million to a few million of run rate revenue, they've figured out their scalable, or they're starting to figure out their scalable customer acquisition channels.
This quote outlines what Simon Menashy considers a good Series A funding round, focusing on the company's revenue, growth strategy, and key performance indicators.## Investment Duration and Exit Strategies
"So we sold a business last year called Base 79, which we had in our portfolio for five years. We've got a couple of companies that have been in our portfolio for only two or three years that are getting quite significant inbound interest in acquisition... But then equally, we have a company in our portfolio that's been there for more than ten years... So I hope it will come back to three to seven years. But right now, it's certainly at the upper end of that."
This quote explains that investment lengths can differ based on various factors such as business growth, market conditions, and strategic decisions about when to sell or continue investing.
"I would say defensiveness... if a founder doesn't seem willing to engage in that right from the start, then I think it's going to be difficult to have that sort of relationship. And also we've got to work with that person for it could be three to ten years."
Simon Menashy emphasizes the importance of a founder's openness to feedback and collaboration, highlighting that defensiveness can hinder the establishment of a productive long-term relationship with investors.
"I think very much the potential for market creation... Often a market can be money coming out of a consumer's pocket, so it's coming out of their pocket for your thing instead of the other thing... But over time, hopefully you can create your own market for some companies."
Simon Menashy discusses how startups can create new markets by innovating within established ones and how consumer spending can shift towards new offerings, highlighting the importance of market dynamics in investment decisions.
"It's dangerous to bet against apple on these sorts of things... version one is going to be rubbish, but still sell a lot, and version two will be much better and a big success."
Simon Menashy shares his personal view on the Apple Watch, suggesting that while the first version might have shortcomings, it will likely sell well due to Apple's brand strength, with improvements expected in subsequent versions.
"An investment in a business called growth intelligence... it's a company that uses machine learning and big data techniques to solve a pretty simple problem... we liked it because it's a big market, it's a big problem... it's an example of using really smart, cutting edge technology and analytics."
Simon Menashy explains why Growth Intelligence was a compelling investment, highlighting the company's market potential, problem-solving approach, and advanced technological application.