3 Reasons why React will reign supreme over all the others?

Seth Samel argues that React's dominance in web development stems from its first-mover advantage, straightforward syntax, and strong community support. React simplified the complexities found in frameworks like Angular, allowing JavaScript developers to easily adopt its more intuitive HTML-like JSX syntax. This simplicity attracted a large developer base, which in turn fostered a robust community that ensures readily available assistance for common issues. Additionally, React's widespread adoption by major companies like Facebook and Netflix further cements its status, as smaller companies and developers often follow the tech stacks of industry leaders. Samel suggests that for any new framework to surpass React, it must not only address React's shortcomings but also offer a superior developer experience without reinventing the wheel.

• React popularized single-page applications (SPAs), gaining an early lead in the market.
• Angular, while preceding React, was complex and had a steep learning curve.
• React's simplicity allows JavaScript developers to quickly pick it up, unlike Angular.
• First mover advantage has also helped React against competitors like Flutter in single codebase multiplatform applications.
• This advantage is not unique to React but is a common benefit in business for any first-to-market product or service.

"The first reason why React will always reign Supreme is because of the first mover advantage... React was the first one to popularize single-page applications... Angular was too complex to set up... React... you can just pick up React in a day."

• This quote emphasizes React's early adoption and ease of use compared to Angular, highlighting the strategic benefit of being first to market with a simpler solution.

• React's syntax is intuitive for front-end developers from various backgrounds.
• Minor syntax changes from HTML, like 'className' instead of 'class' and capitalized event handlers, are easy to adapt to.
• Competing frameworks like Vue alter the language more significantly, which can feel less familiar to those accustomed to HTML.

"The second reason why I think React will always reign Supreme is the syntax... if you are like a front-end developer... it's very easy for you to just look at React code and understand what is going there."

• This quote highlights the ease of understanding React's syntax for developers with front-end experience, suggesting that its closeness to HTML is a key factor in its dominance.

"Apart from like very few changes that they made for example now classes are called class names instead of using class you see class name... the name of the event handler is always capitalized... but apart from that, nothing like you just reading HTML."

• This quote details the minor syntactical differences between React and HTML, reinforcing the idea that React's syntax is highly accessible to those familiar with HTML.

• Vue, for example, introduces syntax that deviates more from standard JavaScript and HTML, potentially creating a steeper learning curve.
• The way Vue handles 'for' loops differs from the traditional JavaScript approach, which can be confusing for developers.

"The problem with something like Vue and especially Vue... they change a lot of the language... in Vue, for loops work differently... in normal JavaScript and TypeScript if you say for in it will give like index... but in Vue it works differently."

• This quote compares React's minor syntax changes to Vue's more substantial deviations from traditional JavaScript and HTML, suggesting that these changes can make Vue feel less familiar and potentially more difficult to learn.

• The speaker initially wanted to enjoy using Vue.js due to positive feedback.
• They found Vue.js to be changing familiar coding practices.
• Vue.js allows Styles, scripts, and HTML to be in the same folder but different tags, which the speaker found unusual.
• The speaker prefers React's simpler file structure.

"I really wanted to like Vue, but the problem was that I just find it changing a lot of things that I'm already used to."

• This quote highlights the speaker's resistance to change and preference for familiarity in coding practices.

"The fact that you can have your Styles and your script and your HTML like in the same folder but different tags it was just weird."

• The speaker is expressing discomfort with Vue.js's organizational structure for code, which differs from what they are accustomed to.

• React's syntax is described as "too sweet" by the speaker.
• React doesn't require changing file extensions, allowing developers to feel like they are writing in native JavaScript or TypeScript.
• Vue.js requires changing file extensions, which can be a deterrent for some developers.

"The syntax of React is just too sweet and for the fact that it doesn't even change the extension so it makes you feel like you're writing your native JavaScript or you're writing your native TypeScript."

• This quote emphasizes the speaker's preference for React's syntax and its similarity to native JavaScript or TypeScript.

"With Vue you have to change the file extension so that minute difference will even make people not like it that much."

• The speaker suggests that small differences like file extension changes can significantly affect a developer's preference for a framework.

• The speaker identifies two aspects of React's community: the number of developers using it and the number of companies adopting it.
• React's large developer base provides better support and solutions for common issues.
• Big companies using React influence tech trends and adoption rates.

"No matter what issue you faced in React because of the number of developers that are out there, it is very likely that a lot of them are supposed to face that issue and because there are a lot of them that may have possibly faced that issue it's very easy for you to get help."

• The quote explains the advantage of a large community where common problems are quickly addressed due to shared experiences among developers.

"With React now you have a lot of big guys that are using it, Facebook, Netflix, Twitter, the rest most of these big companies are using it."

• The speaker notes the impact of major companies using React on its popularity and the tendency of the tech industry to follow the lead of successful organizations.

• The tech industry often follows the technological choices of leading companies.
• Developers may choose a framework simply because it is used by a company like Facebook.

"...one thing that is really popular in the tech industry is that they like copying each other... Facebook is using React so let's use React."

• The speaker is commenting on the herd mentality within the tech industry, where the technology stacks of influential companies are emulated by others.

• Big companies adopting React make it appealing for smaller companies to do the same.
• Developers are attracted to React because of its widespread use, which allows for better salary negotiation.
• The availability of React developers provides a competitive advantage in hiring.

"Facebook is using React, so I want to use React and that's how it usually works."

This quote highlights the influence of big companies on technology adoption, implying that smaller companies and individual developers often follow the lead of industry giants like Facebook.

"A lot of these big companies are adopted to React, it makes it more appealing for these small companies to just adopt it because number one, the advantage of that is that you will be able to get a lot of developers."

This quote emphasizes the practical advantage for small companies to adopt React due to the large pool of developers familiar with it, facilitating hiring and potentially reducing costs.

"Because there are a lot of React developers, you're able to negotiate your salary better."

This quote suggests that the high demand for React developers gives them leverage in salary negotiations.

• Companies using less popular frameworks may have to pay more due to a smaller pool of available developers.
• Developers have an incentive to demand higher prices and better conditions when skilled in less common technologies.
• The negotiation is a two-way street, with companies also seeking favorable terms.

"If you are using something like Svelte or Vue that only have a few developers... whatever price that they tell you is the price you're most likely going to pay."

This quote explains the supply and demand dynamics in salary negotiation, where scarcity of developers in certain technologies can drive up the cost for companies.

"They develop this incentive to want to buy in for a higher price and better conditions, and the company will want to also buy in for themselves because it's a two-way thing."

This quote indicates that both developers and companies have incentives to negotiate terms that are beneficial to them, especially when dealing with less common technologies.

• Large companies contribute to solving issues within React, benefiting the entire community.
• Fixes and optimizations made by big companies may not be known to the wider community but are shared nonetheless.
• Smaller frameworks lack the same level of contribution and problem-solving from large companies.

"A lot of the issues that may come up in React, those big companies will be able to solve it for the community because they have the best developers."

This quote acknowledges the role of large companies in addressing technical challenges within React, leveraging their resources to benefit the broader developer community.

"Some of the optimization that you may get in React may not even be something that the React team itself worked on, maybe something that a big company out there like maybe Twitter is working on."

This quote suggests that contributions to React's optimization can come from external sources, such as other big companies, and are not limited to the official React development team.

• Small companies often focus on optimization to compete with React.
• Benchmarks showing performance improvements are commonly used to promote new frameworks.
• However, developers may not prioritize small performance gains over established tools like React.

"How do you go about it now, the first thing I want to say is, a lot of time these small companies focus on one thing, most of them offer optimization."

This quote outlines a common strategy for new frameworks trying to enter the market, focusing on performance optimization as a selling point.

"How many developers really care about how fast or how slow the tool that they use is?"

This quote challenges the assumption that performance is the primary concern for developers when choosing a framework, suggesting that other factors may be more important.

"I don't think I've ever seen people leaving a framework because it's slower than the other framework or a library because it's slower than the other Library."

This quote further supports the idea that performance is not the sole determinant for developers when selecting a technology stack, as they rarely abandon a framework solely due to speed issues.

• Developers often focus on optimizing their framework to outperform others in benchmarks.
• A better approach to replace a popular framework like React would be to enhance the developer experience.
• React has weaknesses, such as poor SEO compatibility and routing issues.
• Next.js addressed these weaknesses, leading to its adoption and even React's endorsement.

"A lot of times I feel like these developers of these new frameworks focus on the wrong thing, which is they trying to optimize their own platform to be faster than React in benchmarks."

• The quote highlights a common mistake where framework developers prioritize speed benchmarks over user experience improvements.

"Next.js came in and fixed some of those weaknesses, one of the major weaknesses is the fact that it doesn't work with SEO and Next.js came and fixed it."

• This quote illustrates how Next.js improved upon React by solving specific issues such as SEO compatibility, which contributed to its success.

"Page based routing is unarguably better than what we are doing with React Router."

• The speaker suggests that Next.js's page-based routing is a superior solution to React Router's approach, enhancing the overall developer experience.

• Identify existing issues with a popular framework like React and focus on solving them.
• Improve upon the existing framework by optimizing it, rather than completely changing the core concept.
• Consider alternative methods for UI updates to increase efficiency.

"If I have the chance to build something that is going to be better than React, I would say this are the first I would do: number one, find an issue with React and then build on it."

• The speaker outlines a strategic approach to creating a superior framework by first identifying and addressing React's shortcomings.

"Instead of changing the whole idea of Node like how Dino was trying to do, you just optimize Node.js, they just optimize the runtime and then they made everything work like under the hood."

• This quote explains the advantage of optimizing an existing framework's runtime, like Node.js, instead of overhauling the entire concept, as Dino attempted.

"Instead of just destroying the whole UI and then rebuilding from scratch for every state change, you can implement something better like how signals work."

• The speaker suggests that there is room for improvement in how UI updates are handled, proposing a more efficient method akin to the way signals work in other frameworks.

• The speaker encourages viewers to engage with their content by liking, subscribing, and sharing.
• Expresses gratitude for viewer support and teases a surprise in the next video.

"Please don't forget to like, subscribe and stay tuned to the next one. I promise the next one is going to be a big surprise."

• This quote is a call to action for viewers to interact with the channel and stay engaged for future content.

"Thank you so much for your support and see you in the next one."

• The speaker concludes by thanking the audience for their support, reinforcing the importance of viewer engagement to the success of their content.